Gulf & S. I. R. v. Williams

69 So. 215, 109 Miss. 429
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1915·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In response to the suggestion of error, we wish to withdraw this expression from the opinion dismissing this appeal, viz.: “The granting of the nonsuit was a matter addressed to the discretion of the trial judge.” Plaintiff, as a matter of right, may suffer a voluntary nonsuit at any time “before the jury retire to consider their verdict,” and the trial court has no discretion in the premises. Before the jury retired to consider their verdict in the present case, plaintiff' elected to take a nonsuit, and that ended the matter; the plaintiff’s case then on trial was dismissed, and defendant has no right to complain.

Suggestion of error overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gulf & S. I. R. v. Williams, 69 So. 215, 109 Miss. 429 (Mich. 1915).

69 So. 215 (Gulf & S. I. R. v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hattiesburg Butane Gas Company v. Griffin
206 So. 2d 845 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1968)
Hill v. Johnson-Cone Brick Co.
177 So. 520 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1937)
Lucedale Commercial Co. v. Strength
141 So. 769 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)
Cocke v. Taylor, Admr.
13 Tenn. App. 15 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1931)
Gooch v. Coleman
109 So. 18 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)
Darby v. Pidgeon Thomas Iron Co.
144 Tenn. 298 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1921)
Edwards v. Yazoo & M. V. R.
73 So. 789 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)