Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. McFarland
264 U.S. 573, 44 S. Ct. 402, 68 L. Ed. 856, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2559
Opinion
Affirmed upon authority of (1) Choctaw & Gulf R. R. Co. v. Harrison, 235 U. S. 292; Lacoste v. Department of Conservation of Louisiana, 263 U. S. 545; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467, 482; Chicago & Alton R. R. Co. v. Tranbarger, 238 U. S. 67, 76-77; Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corporation, 248 U. S. 372, 375; Levy Leasing Co. v. Siegel, 258 U. S. 242, 247.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. McFarland, 264 U.S. 573, 44 S. Ct. 402, 68 L. Ed. 856, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2559 (1924).
264 U.S. 573 (Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. McFarland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bel Oil Corporation v. Fontenot
117 So. 2d 571 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1959)
Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway
281 U.S. 146 (Supreme Court, 1930)
United States v. Rudd
30 F.2d 308 (E.D. New York, 1927)
Cooley v. Buie
291 S.W. 876 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1927)
Cooley v. Buie
284 S.W. 702 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)