Gulf Production Co. v. Mose Granger

Texas Commission of Appeals

Gulf Production Co. v. Mose Granger

57 S.W.2d 1116

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 1933

DocketMotion No. 10552; No. 1344-5890

StatusPublished

This text of 57 S.W.2d 1116 (Gulf Production Co. v. Mose Granger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gulf Production Co. v. Mose Granger, 57 S.W.2d 1116 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

LEDDY, Judge.

It is strenuously insisted in appellant’s motion for rehearing that the Gulf Production Company and its lessor did not prevail against the Humble Company' and its lessor within the meaning of the contract, and that this court should so hold.

It is not within the province of this court to determine such question, as the same was not submitted for our consideration in the certificate presented by the honorable Court of Civil Appeals. The only question submitted to us in the certificate concerning the construction of the contract in question was whether the Kishi suit was settled or compromised so as to relieve appellant of liability under its contract. Whether appellant was in fact liable under another provision of the contract was not considered by us, and we expressed no opinion thereon.

We have carefully considered the argument presented in the motion, but have not been convinced that the questions submitted were incorrectly answered in our original opinion.

We recommend that appellant’s motion for rehearing be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEDDY, Judge.

It is strenuously insisted in appellant’s motion for rehearing that the Gulf Production Company and its lessor did not prevail against the Humble Company' and its lessor within the meaning of the contract, and that this court should so hold.

It is not within the province of this court to determine such question, as the same was not submitted for our consideration in the certificate presented by the honorable Court of Civil Appeals. The only question submitted to us in the certificate concerning the construction of the contract in question was whether the Kishi suit was settled or compromised so as to relieve appellant of liability under its contract. Whether appellant was in fact liable under another provision of the contract was not considered by us, and we expressed no opinion thereon.

We have carefully considered the argument presented in the motion, but have not been convinced that the questions submitted were incorrectly answered in our original opinion.

We recommend that appellant’s motion for rehearing be overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 S.W.2d 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulf-production-co-v-mose-granger-texcommnapp-1933.