Gulf Power Company v. FCC
Opinion
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT September 30, 2002 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK No. 98-6222
FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
GULF POWER COMPANY; ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, et al.,
Petitioners,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
No. 98-6414
FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. ____________
No. 98-6430 ____________ FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
_____________
No. 98-6431 _____________ FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
2 ________________
No. 98-6442 ________________ FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, d.b.a. AMERENUE,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
_________________
No. 98-6458 _________________ FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICES CORPORATION,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
3 _________________
No. 98-6476 __________________ FCC Docket No. 97-151
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
____________
No. 98-6477 ____________ FCC Docket No. 97-151
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC and POWER COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
4 ______________
No. 98-6478 ______________ FCC Docket No. 97-151
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
_______________
No. 98-6485 ________________ FCC Docket No. 97-151
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
5 ________________
No. 98-6486 _________________ FCC Docket No. 97-151
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
______________
No. 98-2589 _______________ FCC Docket No. 97-151
TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
6 ____________
No. 98-4675 _____________ FCC Docket No. 98-20
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Communications Commission
(September 30, 2002)
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and GARWOOD*, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In Gulf Power Co. v. FCC, 208 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2000), we considered
an attack on the FCC’s 1998 regulations, Report and Order, 13 F.C.C.R. 6777,
1998 WL 46987, promulgated pursuant to the 1996 amendments to the Pole
Attachment Act, 47 U.S.C. § 244(f) (Supp. II 1996). We held that the facial
_________________
*Honorable Will L. Garwood, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.
7 validity of the rent formula developed by the FCC was not ripe for review, but that
the FCC lacked statutory authority to regulate the wireless carriers and the
provision of the Internet service under the 1996 Act. Gulf Power, 208 F.3d at
1279. The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the latter determination. See
National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Inc. v. Gulf Power Co., 534
U.S. 327, 122 S. Ct. 882, 151 L. Ed. 794 (2002). Accordingly, the FCC Order is
reinstated.
SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gulf Power Company v. FCC (Gulf Power Company v. FCC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.