Gulf Power Company v. FCC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 11, 2000·No. 98-6222·Published

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

September 30, 2002

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

No. 98-6222

FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS

GULF POWER COMPANY; ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, et al.,

Petitioners,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,

Respondents.

No. 98-6414

FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents.

No. 98-6430

FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES, Respondents.

No. 98-6431

FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS

TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES, Respondents.

No. 98-6442

FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS

UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, d.b.a. AMERENUE, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,

Respondents.

No. 98-6458

FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICES CORPORATION, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,

Respondents.

No. 98-6476

FCC Docket No. 97-151

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,

Respondents.

No. 98-6477

FCC Docket No. 97-151

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC and POWER COMPANY, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,

Respondents.

No. 98-6478

FCC Docket No. 97-151

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,

Respondents.

No. 98-6485

FCC Docket No. 97-151

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,

Respondents.

No. 98-6486

FCC Docket No. 97-151

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,

Respondents.

No. 98-2589

FCC Docket No. 97-151

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,

Respondents.

No. 98-4675

FCC Docket No. 98-20

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Petitioner,

versus

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES, Respondents.

Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Communications Commission

(September 30, 2002)

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and GARWOOD*, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

In Gulf Power Co. v. FCC, 208 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2000), we considered an attack on the FCC’s 1998 regulations, Report and Order, 13 F.C.C.R. 6777, 1998 WL 46987, promulgated pursuant to the 1996 amendments to the Pole Attachment Act, 47 U.S.C. § 244(f) (Supp. II 1996). We held that the facial

*Honorable Will L. Garwood, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

validity of the rent formula developed by the FCC was not ripe for review, but that the FCC lacked statutory authority to regulate the wireless carriers and the provision of the Internet service under the 1996 Act. Gulf Power, 208 F.3d at 1279. The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the latter determination. See National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Inc. v. Gulf Power Co., 534 U.S. 327, 122 S. Ct. 882, 151 L. Ed. 794 (2002). Accordingly, the FCC Order is reinstated.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gulf Power Company v. FCC, (11th Cir. 2000).

Gulf Power Company v. FCC (Gulf Power Company v. FCC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related