Gulf Oil Realty Co. v. Department of Transportation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gulf Oil Realty Co. v. Department of Transportation

685 So. 2d 1032, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 114, 1997 WL 7167

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 1997·No. Nos. 95-3287, 96-9·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

We reverse the order dismissing appellant’s claim against the State Department of Transportation [“DOT”] for a way of necessity. The three grounds advanced by DOT [1033]*1033below and on appeal will not support dismissal with prejudice. Consistent with South Florida Water Management District v. Layton, 402 So.2d 597 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), -we conclude that sovereign immunity does not bar a claim for a way of necessity pursuant to section 704.01(1), Florida Statutes. Nor can it be said, due to the sparseness of the allegations in the complaint, that appellant’s claim is time barred. Finally, we cannot agree that the City of Orlando is an indispensable party to the appellant’s way of necessity claim. Although appellant’s way of necessity claim may ultimately fail, the grounds asserted by DOT for dismissal at this stage are not legally sufficient.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, Judge.

We reverse the order dismissing appellant’s claim against the State Department of Transportation [“DOT”] for a way of necessity. The three grounds advanced by DOT [1033]*1033below and on appeal will not support dismissal with prejudice. Consistent with South Florida Water Management District v. Layton, 402 So.2d 597 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), -we conclude that sovereign immunity does not bar a claim for a way of necessity pursuant to section 704.01(1), Florida Statutes. Nor can it be said, due to the sparseness of the allegations in the complaint, that appellant’s claim is time barred. Finally, we cannot agree that the City of Orlando is an indispensable party to the appellant’s way of necessity claim. Although appellant’s way of necessity claim may ultimately fail, the grounds asserted by DOT for dismissal at this stage are not legally sufficient.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Gulf Oil Realty Co. v. Department of Transportation, 685 So. 2d 1032, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 114, 1997 WL 7167 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

685 So. 2d 1032 (Gulf Oil Realty Co. v. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related