Gulf Oil Corp. v. Grady

Second Circuit

Gulf Oil Corp. v. Grady

110 F.2d 178, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4502

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 4, 1940

DocketNo. 248

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 110 F.2d 178 (Gulf Oil Corp. v. Grady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gulf Oil Corp. v. Grady, 110 F.2d 178, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4502 (2d Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The bankrupts, operators of a gasoline filling station, purchased from the appellant for resale 1,700 gallons of gasoline. The New York Tax Law, Consol.Laws. N.Y. 'c. 60, Article 12-A, § 282 ff., imposed a tax upon this transaction. This tax, amounting to $68, was paid to the state by the appellant, who now seeks to recover the sum from the bankrupts’ estate as a claim entitled to priority under § 64 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 52 Stat. 874, 11 U.S.C.A. § 104. The claim was allowed as a general claim, but denied any priority.

There is no basis for the claimed priority. The appellant was a “distributor” of motor fuel as defined in Article 12-A, and the statute makes the distributor, not the purchaser, the taxpayer, even though the declared intention of § 289-c is to place the ultimate burden of the tax on those persons who use the motor fuel for the operation of motor vehicles on the highways. See In re Riemer, 2 Cir., 82 F.2d 162, 163. There is no provision in the New York statute under which the state may collect the gasoline tax from the purchaser or “owner”. Hence the theory of subrogation is without foundation; the distributor cannot get subrogation by the payment of what is its own obligation. The cases dealing with the statutes of other states upon which the appellant relies involve statutes in which the state could have filed its tax claim in the bankruptcy proceeding. The debt which the bankrupts here owe the appellant is not one “for taxes legally due and owing by the bankrupt to * * * any state;” for in any event the bankrupt could not be considered the primary taxpayer. See in re Waller, D.C., 142 F. 883; Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co., [179]*1792 Cir., 8 F.2d 859; cf. New York City v. Goldstein, 299 U.S. 522, 57 S.Ct. 321, 81 L.Ed. 384; Matter of Atlas Television Co., 273 N.Y. 51, 6 N.E.2d 94.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The bankrupts, operators of a gasoline filling station, purchased from the appellant for resale 1,700 gallons of gasoline. The New York Tax Law, Consol.Laws. N.Y. 'c. 60, Article 12-A, § 282 ff., imposed a tax upon this transaction. This tax, amounting to $68, was paid to the state by the appellant, who now seeks to recover the sum from the bankrupts’ estate as a claim entitled to priority under § 64 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 52 Stat. 874, 11 U.S.C.A. § 104. The claim was allowed as a general claim, but denied any priority.

There is no basis for the claimed priority. The appellant was a “distributor” of motor fuel as defined in Article 12-A, and the statute makes the distributor, not the purchaser, the taxpayer, even though the declared intention of § 289-c is to place the ultimate burden of the tax on those persons who use the motor fuel for the operation of motor vehicles on the highways. See In re Riemer, 2 Cir., 82 F.2d 162, 163. There is no provision in the New York statute under which the state may collect the gasoline tax from the purchaser or “owner”. Hence the theory of subrogation is without foundation; the distributor cannot get subrogation by the payment of what is its own obligation. The cases dealing with the statutes of other states upon which the appellant relies involve statutes in which the state could have filed its tax claim in the bankruptcy proceeding. The debt which the bankrupts here owe the appellant is not one “for taxes legally due and owing by the bankrupt to * * * any state;” for in any event the bankrupt could not be considered the primary taxpayer. See in re Waller, D.C., 142 F. 883; Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co., [179]*1792 Cir., 8 F.2d 859; cf. New York City v. Goldstein, 299 U.S. 522, 57 S.Ct. 321, 81 L.Ed. 384; Matter of Atlas Television Co., 273 N.Y. 51, 6 N.E.2d 94.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 F.2d 178, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulf-oil-corp-v-grady-ca2-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack