Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Riordan

22 S.W. 514, 85 Tex. 511, 1893 Tex. LEXIS 220
Texas Supreme Court·Decided May 25, 1893·No. No. 71.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

Application for writ of error is made by Carrie Riordan and others, who are plaintiffs, and in the District Court recovered a judgment, which on appeal was reversed and the cause remanded by the Court of Civil Appeals, on the ground that the facts proved did not entitle the plaintiffs to a judgment.

The case involves no question that would give this court jurisdiction, nor is it made to appear, that “ the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals reversing the judgment practically settles the case.”

What the facts may be shown to be on another trial, we can have no knowledge, and the petition for writ of error does not show or suggest *513 that no proof other than that made on the former trial may not be produced on another.

For want of jurisdiction, the application must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Application dismissed.

Delivered May 25, 1893.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Riordan, 22 S.W. 514, 85 Tex. 511, 1893 Tex. LEXIS 220 (Tex. 1893).

22 S.W. 514 (Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Riordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonner v. Thompson
205 S.W.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1947)