Gulf Coast Supply & Manufacturing LLC v. Your Roofers LLC

CourtDistrict Court, D. South Carolina
DecidedApril 6, 2021
Docket3:21-cv-00330
StatusUnknown

This text of Gulf Coast Supply & Manufacturing LLC v. Your Roofers LLC (Gulf Coast Supply & Manufacturing LLC v. Your Roofers LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gulf Coast Supply & Manufacturing LLC v. Your Roofers LLC, (D.S.C. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

United States of America, for the ) C/A No.: 3:21-330-JMC-SVH use of Gulf Coast Supply & ) Manufacturing, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER Vs. ) ) Fortis SBJV, LLC; Western Surety ) Company; Federal Insurance ) Company; Your Roofers LLC; and ) Michelle Hopper, ) ) Defendants. ) )

Plaintiff filed this action asserting claims pursuant to 40 U.S.C. §§ 3131, . (“the Miller Act”). [ECF No. 1]. The Clerk of Court issued the summons on February 3, 2021. [ECF Nos. 2–6]. On April 1, 2021, Michelle Hopper filed an unsigned pro se answer on her own behalf and purportedly on behalf of Your Roofers, LLC (“Your Roofers”). [ECF No. 24]. The answer did not have an address. It is well-established that a corporate entity cannot appear pro se and must be represented by counsel in court. The United States Supreme Court recognized that: [i]t has been the law for the better part of two centuries . . . that a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through 1 licensed counsel. As the courts have recognized, the rationale for that rule applies equally to all artificial entities. Thus, save a few aberrant cases, the lower courts have uniformly held that 28 U.S.C. § 1654, providing that “parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel,” does not allow corporations, partnerships, or associations to appear in federal court otherwise than through a licensed attorney.

, 506 U.S. 194, 201–02 (1993) (internal citations and footnote omitted); , 326 F. App’x 141, 142 (4th Cir. 2009) (this rule also applies to limited liability corporations); , 506 F.3d 350, 354 n.3 (4th Cir. 2007). While 28 U.S.C. § 1654 allows individuals to “plead and conduct their own cases personally,” the statute does not extend that right to represent other parties. Accordingly, Your Roofers is directed to retain counsel and to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint by May 3, 2021. If Your Roofers fails to retain licensed counsel to file an entry of appearance and submit a responsive pleading by May 3, 2021, it may be subject to an entry of default judgment against it. Additionally, Hopper is directed to provide a signed answer on her own

behalf and to confirm her correct address by April 19, 2021. Hopper is

2 advised that failure to file a signed answer and confirm her address by April 19, 2021, may result in an entry of default judgment against her. Hopper is further ordered to always keep the Clerk of Court advised in writing (United States District Court, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201) of any address change, to assure that orders or other matters that specify deadlines are received. Failure to comply with this order may result in an entry of judgment against her. IT IS SO ORDERED. PP Ut Lladger April 6, 2021 Shiva V. Hodges Columbia, South Carolina United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RZS Holdings AVV v. PDVSA Petroleo S.A.
506 F.3d 350 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)
Honour Technical Group, Inc. v. United States
326 F. App'x 141 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gulf Coast Supply & Manufacturing LLC v. Your Roofers LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulf-coast-supply-manufacturing-llc-v-your-roofers-llc-scd-2021.