Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley

Eighth Circuit

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley

54 F. 486, 4 C.C.A. 460, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1471

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 20, 1893·No. No. 148·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was submitted without oral argument, on the assumption, no doubt, that it presents the same state of facts and the same questions of law which were considered in the cases of Railway Co. v. Wal[487]*487lace, 54 Fed. Rep. 485, and Railway Co. v. Seifred, Id. 485, (decided at the December term of this court, at Little Rock, Ark.,) in which the same counsel were engaged. We have examined the record, and have reached the conclusion that such assumption on the part of counsel is correct, and that the judgment must be affirmed, in conformity with the opinion announced in those cases.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case was submitted without oral argument, on the assumption, no doubt, that it presents the same state of facts and the same questions of law which were considered in the cases of Railway Co. v. Wal[487]*487lace, 54 Fed. Rep. 485, and Railway Co. v. Seifred, Id. 485, (decided at the December term of this court, at Little Rock, Ark.,) in which the same counsel were engaged. We have examined the record, and have reached the conclusion that such assumption on the part of counsel is correct, and that the judgment must be affirmed, in conformity with the opinion announced in those cases.

It is so ordered.

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley, 54 F. 486, 4 C.C.A. 460, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1471 (8th Cir. 1893).

Pincite

54 F. 486 (Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related