Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley
This text of 54 F. 486 (Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was submitted without oral argument, on the assumption, no doubt, that it presents the same state of facts and the same questions of law which were considered in the cases of Railway Co. v. Wal[487]*487lace, 54 Fed. Rep. 485, and Railway Co. v. Seifred, Id. 485, (decided at the December term of this court, at Little Rock, Ark.,) in which the same counsel were engaged. We have examined the record, and have reached the conclusion that such assumption on the part of counsel is correct, and that the judgment must be affirmed, in conformity with the opinion announced in those cases.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F. 486, 4 C.C.A. 460, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulf-c-s-f-ry-co-v-conley-ca8-1893.