Guldin v. Lorah
21 A. 504, 141 Pa. 109, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1046
Opinion
This was a suit brought by the administratrix of a deceased partner against the surviving partner, to compel an accounting for the partnership assets. The defence interposed was the statute of limitations. No good reason is apparent why it should not be applied in such case, nor why the plaintiff should have waited over seven years before commencing suit. The right to plead the statute in such cases, is distinctly recognized in Hamilton v. Hamilton, 18 Pa. 20; McKelvy’s App., 72 Pa. 413; Everhart’s App., 106 Pa. 349.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guldin v. Lorah, 21 A. 504, 141 Pa. 109, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1046 (Pa. 1891).
21 A. 504 (Guldin v. Lorah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ebbert v. Plymouth Oil Co.
34 A.2d 493 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Herron v. Herron
64 Pa. Super. 569 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Borland's Appeal
83 A. 110 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)