Guldin v. Lorah

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Guldin v. Lorah

21 A. 504, 141 Pa. 109, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1046

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 23, 1891

DocketNo. 334

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 21 A. 504 (Guldin v. Lorah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guldin v. Lorah, 21 A. 504, 141 Pa. 109, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1046 (Pa. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:'

This was a suit brought by the administratrix of a deceased partner against the surviving partner, to compel an accounting for the partnership assets. The defence interposed was the statute of limitations. No good reason is apparent why it should not be applied in such case, nor why the plaintiff should have waited over seven years before commencing suit. The right to plead the statute in such cases, is distinctly recognized in Hamilton v. Hamilton, 18 Pa. 20; McKelvy’s App., 72 Pa. 413; Everhart’s App., 106 Pa. 349.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:'

This was a suit brought by the administratrix of a deceased partner against the surviving partner, to compel an accounting for the partnership assets. The defence interposed was the statute of limitations. No good reason is apparent why it should not be applied in such case, nor why the plaintiff should have waited over seven years before commencing suit. The right to plead the statute in such cases, is distinctly recognized in Hamilton v. Hamilton, 18 Pa. 20; McKelvy’s App., 72 Pa. 413; Everhart’s App., 106 Pa. 349.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A. 504, 141 Pa. 109, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guldin-v-lorah-pa-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack