Guiterman v. Saterlie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Guiterman v. Saterlie

78 N.W. 863, 76 Minn. 19, 1899 Minn. LEXIS 523

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 19, 1899

DocketNos. 11,514—(45)

StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.W. 863 (Guiterman v. Saterlie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guiterman v. Saterlie, 78 N.W. 863, 76 Minn. 19, 1899 Minn. LEXIS 523 (Mich. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

BUCK, J.

The appellant’s brief contains no assignment of errors, as required by rule 9 of this court (60 Minn. v). Nor does the paper book contain the judgment appealed from, as required by said rule.

Neither does the paper book nor return contain a settled case or bill of exceptions, and the oral evidence printed in the paper book is not contained in the return.

For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUCK, J.

The appellant’s brief contains no assignment of errors, as required by rule 9 of this court (60 Minn. v). Nor does the paper book contain the judgment appealed from, as required by said rule.

Neither does the paper book nor return contain a settled case or bill of exceptions, and the oral evidence printed in the paper book is not contained in the return.

For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 N.W. 863, 76 Minn. 19, 1899 Minn. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guiterman-v-saterlie-minn-1899.