Guise v. John C. Guise, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Guise v. John C. Guise, Inc.

174 A. 681, 116 N.J. Eq. 590, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 1007

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 27, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

As to chapter 368 of the laws of 1933 (P. L. 1932 p. 604), we deem it necessary to hold only that the legislative purpose was to make it prospective in operation, and that therefore it does not apply to the instant case.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perskib, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hbtfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

As to chapter 368 of the laws of 1933 (P. L. 1932 p. 604), we deem it necessary to hold only that the legislative purpose was to make it prospective in operation, and that therefore it does not apply to the instant case.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perskib, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hbtfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — Hone.

Guise v. John C. Guise, Inc., 174 A. 681, 116 N.J. Eq. 590, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 1007 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

174 A. 681 (Guise v. John C. Guise, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related