Guiqiu Gao v. William P. Barr

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 2, 2019
Docket18-2063
StatusUnpublished

This text of Guiqiu Gao v. William P. Barr (Guiqiu Gao v. William P. Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guiqiu Gao v. William P. Barr, (4th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2063

GUIQIU GAO,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: June 19, 2019 Decided: July 2, 2019

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dayna Wheatley, WHEATLEY IMMIGRATION LAW, LLC, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Leslie McKay, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Guiqiu Gao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to

reopen as untimely and numerically barred and for failure to set forth a prima facie case

for relief. We have reviewed the administrative record and Gao’s claims and conclude

that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a) (2019); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). We

accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re

Gao (B.I.A. Aug. 10, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mosere v. Mukasey
552 F.3d 397 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Guiqiu Gao v. William P. Barr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guiqiu-gao-v-william-p-barr-ca4-2019.