Guion v. Liverpool, London, & Globe Insurance

Supreme Court

Guion v. Liverpool, London, & Globe Insurance

109 U.S. 173, 3 S. Ct. 108, 27 L. Ed. 895, 1883 U.S. LEXIS 950

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 5, 1883·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice 'Waite,

in delivering the opinion of the court in that case, said:

The petition of Guión was for leave to appeal from a decree in a suit to which hé was not a party. ' We decided in Ex parte Cutting, 94 U. S. 14, that such an appeal could not be taken. He had applied for leave to become a party, but this leave ivas not given. So .he is not a party to the decree from which he appeals. But if he is, he has never perfected an appeal by giving the Inecessary security.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice 'Waite,

in delivering the opinion of the court in that case, said:

The petition of Guión was for leave to appeal from a decree in a suit to which hé was not a party. ' We decided in Ex parte Cutting, 94 U. S. 14, that such an appeal could not be taken. He had applied for leave to become a party, but this leave ivas not given. So .he is not a party to the decree from which he appeals. But if he is, he has never perfected an appeal by giving the Inecessary security.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Guion v. Liverpool, London, & Globe Insurance, 109 U.S. 173, 3 S. Ct. 108, 27 L. Ed. 895, 1883 U.S. LEXIS 950 (1883).

Pincite

109 U.S. 173 (Guion v. Liverpool, London, & Globe Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related