Guion v. England
This text of Guion v. England (Guion v. England) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1428
VERNON A. GUION,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GORDAN R. ENGLAND,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cv-00070-F)
Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 16, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vernon A. Guion, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Kelly Michele Perry, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Vernon A. Guion appeals the district court’s order and
judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellee and
dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Guion v. England, No. 4:06-
cv-00070-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Guion v. England, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guion-v-england-ca4-2008.