Guinta v. Yoost Photo Play Theatre Co.

126 Misc. 375, 213 N.Y.S. 394, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 568
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 126 Misc. 375 (Guinta v. Yoost Photo Play Theatre Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guinta v. Yoost Photo Play Theatre Co., 126 Misc. 375, 213 N.Y.S. 394, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial judge has the power to grant or deny a motion upon legal grounds to set aside a jury’s verdict. But when that authority is once exercised his statutory powers are exhausted. (Colwell v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 57 Misc. 623; Duran v. Chelsea Exchange Bank, 123 id. 158; Conolly v. Jolly, 86 id. 42.) It was, therefore, error for the court to entertain the motion for a reargument of its denial of the motion to set aside the verdict which error requires a reversal of the order. The order appealed from is reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and verdict reinstated.

All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Lydon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prudential Paper Co. v. Ashland Press, Inc.
231 A.D. 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 Misc. 375, 213 N.Y.S. 394, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guinta-v-yoost-photo-play-theatre-co-nyappterm-1926.