Guinness United Distillers & Vintners v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
This text of 50 F. App'x 52 (Guinness United Distillers & Vintners v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
The defendant-appellee, AnheuserBusch, Inc. (“Anheuser-Busch”), challenges on appeal the grant by the District [55]*55Court of a preliminary injunction pending trial to Guinness United Distillers & Vintners (“Guinness”) on Guinness’s claim of trademark infringement, enjoining Anheuser-Busch from marketing a product under a name that Guinness claims infringes on one of its marks. We review the grant of a preliminary injunction, including a preliminary injunction granted on Lanham Act claims, for abuse of discretion. TCPIP Holding Co., Inc. v. Haar Communications, Inc., 244 F.3d 88, 92 (2d Cir. 2001).
The defendant-appellee did not show that the District Court abused its discretion in issuing the preliminary injunction. The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 F. App'x 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guinness-united-distillers-vintners-v-anheuser-busch-inc-ca2-2002.