Guinette v. Asbahr

443 P.2d 617, 250 Or. 516, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 591
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 17, 1968
StatusPublished

This text of 443 P.2d 617 (Guinette v. Asbahr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guinette v. Asbahr, 443 P.2d 617, 250 Or. 516, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 591 (Or. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action on a promissory note. Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiff, contending that there was a failure of proof.

. On the issues made by the pleadings, the plaintiff’s evidence made a- question for the trier of fact. .

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
443 P.2d 617, 250 Or. 516, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guinette-v-asbahr-or-1968.