Guinan v. Trotta
This text of 28 Misc. 2d 695 (Guinan v. Trotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the Supreme Court was predicated on procedure only, not on the merits of plaintiff’s application. She was relegated to a plenary action, and therefore the court below erred in considering the order of the Supreme Court as res judicata to this action.
The-judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs to plaintiff, and motion denied.
Concur—Hbcht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzeb, JJ.
Judgment and order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 Misc. 2d 695, 219 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guinan-v-trotta-nyappterm-1960.