Guinade v. State

940 So. 2d 1241, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18419, 2006 WL 3102297
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 2006·No. No. 5D06-2190·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jerry L. Guinade appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Mr. Guinade alleges that he is entitled to postconviction relief. Specifically, he contends that the trial court violated Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720 by not asking him if there was any legal cause why he should not be sentenced following his conviction, and by not giving him an opportunity to present evidence and argument before pronouncing sentence. We affirm. Rule 3.850 does not authorize relief based on grounds that could have been or should have been raised at trial, and, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence. This claim could or should have been raised on direct appeal, and, therefore, is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guinade v. State, 940 So. 2d 1241, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18419, 2006 WL 3102297 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

940 So. 2d 1241 (Guinade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westwood One, Inc. v. Flight Express, Inc.
940 So. 2d 1241 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)