Guilroy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Guilroy v. State

1929 OK CR 19, 273 P. 1118, 41 Okla. Crim. 388, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 177

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 12, 1929

DocketNo. A-6653.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 19 (Guilroy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guilroy v. State, 1929 OK CR 19, 273 P. 1118, 41 Okla. Crim. 388, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 177 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On information charging that in Okmulgee county, on or about the 8th day of May, 1926, the defendant, Tom Guilroy, did feloniously steal one certain red cow, the property of Scott Redick, he was tried, found guilty of larceny of live stock as charged in the information, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary. From the judgment rendered in pursuance of the verdict an appeal to this court was duly perfected.

The case was called for final submission; no brief hav *389 ing been filed, it was submitted on the record. Thereafter his counsel of record filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On information charging that in Okmulgee county, on or about the 8th day of May, 1926, the defendant, Tom Guilroy, did feloniously steal one certain red cow, the property of Scott Redick, he was tried, found guilty of larceny of live stock as charged in the information, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary. From the judgment rendered in pursuance of the verdict an appeal to this court was duly perfected.

The case was called for final submission; no brief hav *389 ing been filed, it was submitted on the record. Thereafter his counsel of record filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed. ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 19, 273 P. 1118, 41 Okla. Crim. 388, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guilroy-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.