Guillotte v. Thompson
This text of 5 Rob. 141 (Guillotte v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant has appealed from a judgment by default, made final in a possessory action, wherein the petitioner claimed damages for the disturbance. He assigns as error apparent on the face of the record, that the damages demanded were assessed by the court without the intervention of a jury. In treating of the confirmation of judgments rendered by default, the Code of Practice provides, art. 313, that, “ when from the nature of the demand, damages are to be assessed, the court will direct a jury to be summoned to find the same, in the same manner as if the defendant had answered, and the court will give their judgment in conformity with the verdict of the jury.” It has occurred to us, that perhaps this article of the code was repealed by the 17th section of the act approved on the 10th of February, 1841, which provides, that the prayer for a jury shall be disregarded, and the case tried by the court, whenever the party making such prayer shall fail to advance, on filing his petition, or answer, the compensation therein allowed to jurors, and to be charged among the costs, (acts of 1841, p. 17
It is therefore ordered, that the judgment of the District Court be reversed, so far as relates to the question of damages, and that the case be remanded for further proceedings according to law ; but that it be, in all other respects, affirmed. The plaintiff and appellee paying the costs of this appeal.
This act provides :
Section 17. That the jurors serving in the District, Parish, and Commercial Courts sitting in the city of New Orleans, shall be entitled to a compensation of one dollar each, for every case in which they find a verdict, to be charged among the costs, but to [142]*142be advanced by the party when he files his petition or answer praying for a trial by jury, otherwise, said prayer shall be disregarded, and the case tried by the court; and the cases now pending in which a trial by jury is asked for, shall be stricken from the jury docket, unless the compensation to be allowed to jurors is advanced by the party demanding a trial by jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Rob. 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guillotte-v-thompson-la-1843.