Guillotte v. Thompson

5 Rob. 141
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 15, 1843
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Rob. 141 (Guillotte v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guillotte v. Thompson, 5 Rob. 141 (La. 1843).

Opinion

Morphy, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment by default, made final in a possessory action, wherein the petitioner claimed damages for the disturbance. He assigns as error apparent on the face of the record, that the damages demanded were assessed by the court without the intervention of a jury. In treating of the confirmation of judgments rendered by default, the Code of Practice provides, art. 313, that, “ when from the nature of the demand, damages are to be assessed, the court will direct a jury to be summoned to find the same, in the same manner as if the defendant had answered, and the court will give their judgment in conformity with the verdict of the jury.” It has occurred to us, that perhaps this article of the code was repealed by the 17th section of the act approved on the 10th of February, 1841, which provides, that the prayer for a jury shall be disregarded, and the case tried by the court, whenever the party making such prayer shall fail to advance, on filing his petition, or answer, the compensation therein allowed to jurors, and to be charged among the costs, (acts of 1841, p. 17

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olivier v. Cannon
18 La. 474 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1841)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Rob. 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guillotte-v-thompson-la-1843.