Guillot v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Co.

278 U.S. 556, 49 S. Ct. 14, 73 L. Ed. 504, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 10
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 8, 1928
DocketNo. 380
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 U.S. 556 (Guillot v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guillot v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Co., 278 U.S. 556, 49 S. Ct. 14, 73 L. Ed. 504, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 10 (1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The writ of error and appeal heretofore allowed in this cause must be dismissed for the want of jurisdiction..

Mrs. Widow W. Guillot pro se. No appearance for defendant in error and appellee.

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that, even if the same be treated as an application for a writ of certiorari, there is no federal question upon which such á writ can be issued, application for which is therefore also denied.

The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody, as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton v. Arch Hurley Conservancy Dist.
75 P.2d 707 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 U.S. 556, 49 S. Ct. 14, 73 L. Ed. 504, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guillot-v-louisiana-railway-navigation-co-scotus-1928.