Guillot v. Alleman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Guillot v. Alleman

325 So. 2d 633, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4014

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Guillot v. Alleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 303 So. 2d 272 →

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided January 12, 1976·No. No. 10598·Published

Opinion

COVINGTON, Judge:

This appeal was fixed for argument and all attorneys of record and the appellant in proper person were notified. At the time scheduled for argument, the appellant was not present or represented, nor had any brief been filed on behalf of appellant, nor had any motion been filed for continuance.

On authority of Rule VII, Section 5(b), this Court, ex proprio motu, considers said appeal as abandoned; therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COVINGTON, Judge:

This appeal was fixed for argument and all attorneys of record and the appellant in proper person were notified. At the time scheduled for argument, the appellant was not present or represented, nor had any brief been filed on behalf of appellant, nor had any motion been filed for continuance.

On authority of Rule VII, Section 5(b), this Court, ex proprio motu, considers said appeal as abandoned; therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice.

Appeal dismissed.

Guillot v. Alleman, 325 So. 2d 633, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4014 (La. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

325 So. 2d 633 (Guillot v. Alleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.