Guillermo Vega, Jr. v. Susanna Vega

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 28, 2007
Docket13-06-00597-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Guillermo Vega, Jr. v. Susanna Vega (Guillermo Vega, Jr. v. Susanna Vega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guillermo Vega, Jr. v. Susanna Vega, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER13-06-597-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ___



GUILLERMO VEGA, JR., Appellant,



v.


SUSANNA VEGA, Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 93rd District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, GUILLERMO VEGA, JR., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-4678-98-B. The clerk's record was filed on November 21, 2006. No reporter's record was filed. Appellant's brief was due on December 21, 2006. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On April 27, 2007, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.



PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 28th day of June, 2007.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Guillermo Vega, Jr. v. Susanna Vega, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guillermo-vega-jr-v-susanna-vega-texapp-2007.