Guillermo Quinones v. United States

578 F. App'x 609
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 2014
Docket14-1670
StatusUnpublished

This text of 578 F. App'x 609 (Guillermo Quinones v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guillermo Quinones v. United States, 578 F. App'x 609 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Guillermo Quinones appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his action under the Federal Tort Claims Act for lack of jurisdiction. After careful review, see Appley Bros. v. United States, 164 F.3d 1164, 1169-70 (8th Cir.1999) (findings of fact are reviewed for clear error and application of law is reviewed de novo), we agree with the district court that Quinones failed to timely present his claim to the Bureau of Prisons, and thus dismissal was proper. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b); Motley v. United States, 295 F.3d 820, 822 (8th Cir.2002); K.E.S. v. United States, 38 F.3d 1027, 1030 (8th Cir.1994). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Quinones’s appellate motion.

1

. The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

K.E.S. v. United States
38 F.3d 1027 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
Rosalyn Motley v. United States
295 F.3d 820 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 F. App'x 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guillermo-quinones-v-united-states-ca8-2014.