GUILLERMO POZO v. SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, etc.
This text of GUILLERMO POZO v. SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, etc. (GUILLERMO POZO v. SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 11, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1438 Lower Tribunal No. 19-3297 ________________
Guillermo Pozo, Appellant,
vs.
Sunset Real Estate Partners, etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.
Arnaldo Velez, P.A., and Arnaldo Velez, for appellant.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A., and Robert C. Josefsberg, for appellee.
Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.100(a) (“If an answer or third-party
answer contains an affirmative defense and the opposing party seeks to
avoid it, the opposing party must file a reply containing the avoidance.”
(emphasis added)); § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2020) (providing that the
statute of limitations is four years for “[a]ny action not specifically provided
for” in the statute); Manatee Cty. v. Mandarin Dev., Inc., 301 So. 3d 372,
375–76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (“Declaratory judgment actions are subject to a
four-year statute of limitations.” (citing § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2015))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
GUILLERMO POZO v. SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guillermo-pozo-v-sunset-real-estate-partners-etc-fladistctapp-2021.