Guillermo Octavio Arbelaez v. State of Florida & Guillermo Octavio Arbelaez v. Ricky D. Dixon, etc.
Opinion
Supreme Court of Florida
THURSDAY, AUGUST 24, 2023
Guillermo Octavio Arbelaez, SC2015-1628 Appellant(s) Lower Tribunal No(s).:
v. 131988CF0055460001XX
State of Florida, Appellee(s)
Guillermo Octavio Arbelaez, SC2018-0392 Petitioner(s) Lower Tribunal No(s).:
v. 131988CF0055460001XX
Ricky D. Dixon, etc.
Respondent(s)
The “Motion for Rehearing” filed by the Appellant/Petitioner is hereby denied.
MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, and FRANCIS, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion. SASSO, J., did not participate.
LABARGA, J., concurring.
I continue to adhere to my dissent in Arbelaez v. State, 48 Fla.
L. Weekly S88 (Fla. May 25, 2023), wherein I reaffirmed my
dissenting view in Phillips v. State, 299 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. 2020), and
CASE NO.: SC2015-1628 CASE NO.: SC2018-0392 Page Two
my belief that Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. 701 (2014), applies
retroactively.
However, I agree that Arbelaez has not established a basis for
this Court to grant rehearing. Consequently, I have voted to deny
rehearing.
A True Copy Test: SC2015-1628 8/24/2023 SC2018-0392 8/24/2023
SC2015-1628 8/24/2023 SC2018-0392 8/24/2023
SO
Served:
CAP APPEALS ATTORNEY GENERAL TLH LESLIE T. CAMPBELL TODD G. SCHER MIAMI-DADE CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guillermo Octavio Arbelaez v. State of Florida & Guillermo Octavio Arbelaez v. Ricky D. Dixon, etc. (Guillermo Octavio Arbelaez v. State of Florida & Guillermo Octavio Arbelaez v. Ricky D. Dixon, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.