Guillermo Acosta and Jose Molina v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ No. 08-24-00099-CV GUILLERMO ACOSTA and JOSE MOLINA, § Appeal from the Appellants, § 261st District Court v. § of Travis County, Texas UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and (TC# D-1-GN-24-001726) RASIER, LLC, §
Appellees. §
SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT
The February 28, 2025 judgment of the Court is hereby withdrawn, and the following
judgment is issued in its place to correspond with date of issuance of the substituted opinion.
The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the
judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees
recover from Appellants all costs of appeal for which let execution issue. This decision shall be
certified below for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of July 2025.
LISA J. SOTO, Justice
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guillermo Acosta and Jose Molina v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier, LLC (Guillermo Acosta and Jose Molina v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.