Guillemin v. Oehmke

41 So. 3d 972, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10857, 2010 WL 2925350
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 28, 2010
Docket3D10-853
StatusPublished

This text of 41 So. 3d 972 (Guillemin v. Oehmke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guillemin v. Oehmke, 41 So. 3d 972, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10857, 2010 WL 2925350 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

CORTEÑAS, J.

We affirm the order granting the temporary injunction but remand for the trial court to set an adequate bond after the parties have presented evidence as to the appropriate amount.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Professional Medical Group, Inc. v. United Automobile Insurance Company
41 So. 3d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 So. 3d 972, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10857, 2010 WL 2925350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guillemin-v-oehmke-fladistctapp-2010.