Guilford v. State
844 So. 2d 767, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7031, 2003 WL 21076562
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 2003
DocketNo. 3D01-3258
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 844 So. 2d 767 (Guilford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Guilford v. State, 844 So. 2d 767, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7031, 2003 WL 21076562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Because the appellant, Deaven M. Guil-ford, has failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bannister v. State
844 So. 2d 767 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
844 So. 2d 767, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7031, 2003 WL 21076562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guilford-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.