Guilford v. State
844 So. 2d 767, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7031, 2003 WL 21076562
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2003·No. No. 3D01-3258·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because the appellant, Deaven M. Guil-ford, has failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guilford v. State, 844 So. 2d 767, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7031, 2003 WL 21076562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
844 So. 2d 767 (Guilford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bannister v. State
844 So. 2d 767 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)