Guilford v. State
This text of Guilford v. State (Guilford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
SHAQUAN GUILFORD, § § No. 360, 2025 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 2202008181 (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Appellee. § §
Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 9, 2025
ORDER
(1) On August 20, 2025, the appellant, Shaquan Guilford, filed a document
indicating that he wanted to appeal the Superior Court’s August 1, 2025 order
denying his motions for postconviction relief and correction of illegal sentence.
Enclosing the required forms, the Senior Court Clerk sent letters to Guilford
directing him to submit a completed official Form A notice of appeal and to pay the
filing fee or file a motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis by September
4, 2025. On September 10, 2025, the Chief Deputy Clerk sent another letter
directing Guilford to file an official Form A notice of appeal and to either file a
motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee—all by
September 24, 2025—or a notice to show cause would issue. (2) On September 29, 2025, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent
by certified mail, directing Guilford to show cause why this appeal should not be
dismissed for his failure to file an Official Form A and his failure to pay the Supreme
Court filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Guilford did not
respond to the notice to show cause but filed an incomplete motion to proceed in
forma pauperis on October 16, 2025. The Senior Court Clerk sent another letter to
Guilford directing him to file a completed, signed, and notarized motion to proceed
in forma pauperis and an Official Form A by October 31, 2025. On November 10,
2025, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued, by certified mail, another notice directing
Guilford to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file
an Official Form A and his failure to pay the Supreme Court filing fee or file a
motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Guilford received the notice on November 13,
2025. A timely response to the notice to show cause was due on or before November
24, 2025. To date, Guilford has not paid the Supreme Court filing fee; filed a
completed, signed, and notarized motion to proceed in forma pauperis; filed an
Official Form A; or responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this action
is therefore deemed to be unopposed.
2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal be
DISMISSED under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Guilford v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guilford-v-state-del-2025.