Guilford v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
This text of 190 S.W.3d 565 (Guilford v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
American Family Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter, “American Family”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, finding it to be responsible for additional liability coverage. American Family raises three points on appeal, claiming the trial court erred in: faffing to make required factual findings, reforming the contract without clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, and admitting the testimony of an expert witness.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 S.W.3d 565, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 605, 2006 WL 1147659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guilford-v-american-family-mutual-insurance-co-moctapp-2006.