Guilford v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

190 S.W.3d 565, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 605, 2006 WL 1147659
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 2, 2006·No. ED 86578·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter, “American Family”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, finding it to be responsible for additional liability coverage. American Family raises three points on appeal, claiming the trial court erred in: faffing to make required factual findings, reforming the contract without clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, and admitting the testimony of an expert witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guilford v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 190 S.W.3d 565, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 605, 2006 WL 1147659 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

190 S.W.3d 565 (Guilford v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawford v. State
190 S.W.3d 565 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)