Guilbeau v. Parish of St. Landry
This text of 341 F. App'x 974 (Guilbeau v. Parish of St. Landry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Merlin Guilbeau obtained a state-court judgment against St. Landry Parish for injuries he received in an accident on a negligently-maintained road, but he was never paid. He sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the refusal to pay, based on La.Rev.Stat. § 13:5109(B)(2), violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and that the Highway Safety Act of 1966, 23 U.S.C. § 402, preempts the state statute. After a bench trial, the district court denied relief.
*975 The constitutional argument is foreclosed by Minton v. St. Bernard Parish School Board, 803 F.2d 129, 132 (5th Cir.1986). There is no preemption merely because Congress enacted a statute to promote highway safety.
The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court in its comprehensive ruling.
Pursuant to 5th Cih. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
341 F. App'x 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guilbeau-v-parish-of-st-landry-ca5-2009.