Guilbeau v. Latour

163 So. 2d 568, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1597
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 28, 1964
DocketNo. 1134
StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 2d 568 (Guilbeau v. Latour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guilbeau v. Latour, 163 So. 2d 568, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1597 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant husband appeals from an award of alimony pendente lite to the plaintiff wife.

However, although a minute entry reflects that the lower court after trial entered [569]*569an order to pay alimony pendente lite, no signed judgment is in the record. Therefore, there is no final judgment from which .an appeal can be taken, the present appeal is premature, and this court must ex proprio moto dismiss the present appeal in the absence of such signed final judgment. LS A-C.C.P. Art. 1911; Fontenot v. Lee, La.App. 3 Cir., 160 So.2d 26, and cases therein cited.

For the reasons assigned, this appeal is •dismissed without prejudice, at the cost of the defendant-appellant.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fontenot v. Lee
160 So. 2d 26 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 2d 568, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guilbeau-v-latour-lactapp-1964.