Guilavogui v. Mukasey

284 F. App'x 33
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2008·No. No. 07-1802·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Koikoi Guilavogui, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir.2006), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 1147, 166 L.Ed.2d 997 (2007). Further, we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s refusal to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings. See Zhao Quan Chen v. Gonzales, 492 F.3d 153, 155 (2d Cir.2007). Accordingly, we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. We deny Guilavogui’s motion to hold this case in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guilavogui v. Mukasey, 284 F. App'x 33 (4th Cir. 2008).

284 F. App'x 33 (Guilavogui v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zhao Quan Chen v. Gonzales
492 F.3d 153 (Second Circuit, 2007)
Cohen v. United States
127 S. Ct. 1169 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Smith v. Nicholson
127 S. Ct. 1147 (Supreme Court, 2007)