Guier & Diehl v. Page
4 Serg. & Rawle 1
Opinion
stopped Mr. Chauncey, who was about to argue for the plaintiffs, being clearly of opinion, that on a sale for approved paper, the construction of law was, paper ■which ought to be approved, and therefore the contract was not open.
New trial refused, and judgment for the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guier & Diehl v. Page, 4 Serg. & Rawle 1 (Pa. 1818).
4 Serg. & Rawle 1 (Guier & Diehl v. Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cowles v. Cole
137 Misc. 491 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
Foot v. Webb
59 Barb. 38 (New York Supreme Court, 1866)