Guidry v. Supreme Rice Mill

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Guidry v. Supreme Rice Mill

737 So. 2d 858, 98 La.App. 3 Cir. 1253, 1999 La. App. LEXIS 531, 1999 WL 124089

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 10, 1999·No. No. 98-1253·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WOODARD, Judge.

For the reasons found in the companion case rendered this date under the caption number 98-1252, Supreme Rice Mill v. Guidry (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/10/99); 737 So.2d 856, the judgment of the workers’ compensation judge is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Costs of the appeal are assessed one-half to Mr. Guidry and one-half to Supreme Rice Mill.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODARD, Judge.

For the reasons found in the companion case rendered this date under the caption number 98-1252, Supreme Rice Mill v. Guidry (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/10/99); 737 So.2d 856, the judgment of the workers’ compensation judge is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Costs of the appeal are assessed one-half to Mr. Guidry and one-half to Supreme Rice Mill.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

Guidry v. Supreme Rice Mill, 737 So. 2d 858, 98 La.App. 3 Cir. 1253, 1999 La. App. LEXIS 531, 1999 WL 124089 (La. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

737 So. 2d 858 (Guidry v. Supreme Rice Mill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related