Guidet v. Brooklyn
This text of 11 F. Cas. 105 (Guidet v. Brooklyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I think the evidence shows that the pavements which were laid down in Rochester and Buffalo, prior to the date of the plaintiff's alleged invention of what is covered by the claim of his patent, contained the substance and principle of the pavements laid down by the defendant, and alleged to infringe such claim, as respects all the points of such infringement Whatever difference there is, is one of degree, finish and quality of stone, and not of structure or principle of arrangement, either as respects the stone blocks themselves or the pavement composed of them. The bill is dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. Cas. 105, 3 Ban. & A. 291, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guidet-v-brooklyn-circtedny-1878.