Guideone Specialty Mutual Insurance v. United Christian Evangelistic Ass'n of Florida, LLC
This text of 270 F. App'x 766 (Guideone Specialty Mutual Insurance v. United Christian Evangelistic Ass'n of Florida, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants appeal the district court’s judgment, after a bench trial, that Appel-lee GuideOne Specialty Mutual Insurance Company has no duty to defend and/or indemnify Appellants in the underlying action brought against Appellants by Augus-to Medina. After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude the district court did not err and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned order of March 9, 2007.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 F. App'x 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guideone-specialty-mutual-insurance-v-united-christian-evangelistic-assn-ca11-2008.