Guide v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Guide v. State

549 So. 2d 1153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2402, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5652, 1989 WL 118954

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 10, 1989

DocketNo. 89-230

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 549 So. 2d 1153 (Guide v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guide v. State, 549 So. 2d 1153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2402, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5652, 1989 WL 118954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On examination of the record and the state’s confession of error, the sentence entered by the trial court without the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure from sentencing guidelines requires vacation of the sentence imposed upon the defendant and remand to the trial court for proper sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Roberts v. State, 547 So.2d 129 (Fla.1989).

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On examination of the record and the state’s confession of error, the sentence entered by the trial court without the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure from sentencing guidelines requires vacation of the sentence imposed upon the defendant and remand to the trial court for proper sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Roberts v. State, 547 So.2d 129 (Fla.1989).

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

549 So. 2d 1153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2402, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5652, 1989 WL 118954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guide-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack