Guide v. State
549 So. 2d 1153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2402, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5652, 1989 WL 118954
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 1989·No. No. 89-230·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On examination of the record and the state’s confession of error, the sentence entered by the trial court without the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure from sentencing guidelines requires vacation of the sentence imposed upon the defendant and remand to the trial court for proper sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Roberts v. State, 547 So.2d 129 (Fla.1989).
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guide v. State, 549 So. 2d 1153, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2402, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5652, 1989 WL 118954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
549 So. 2d 1153 (Guide v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stennis v. State
567 So. 2d 1071 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)