Guida v. Hsu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guida v. Hsu

187 A.D.2d 485, 590 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12766

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 187 A.D.2d 485 (Guida v. Hsu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guida v. Hsu, 187 A.D.2d 485, 590 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant David L. Hsu appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated November 14, 1990, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant David L. Hsu, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The general allegations of negligence set forth by the plaintiffs’ expert were conclusory and unsupported by evidence, and thus insufficient to defeat the defendant David L. Hsu’s motion for summary judgment (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant David L. Hsu appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated November 14, 1990, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant David L. Hsu, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The general allegations of negligence set forth by the plaintiffs’ expert were conclusory and unsupported by evidence, and thus insufficient to defeat the defendant David L. Hsu’s motion for summary judgment (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 485, 590 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guida-v-hsu-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack