Guibor v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guibor v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, Inc.

90 A.D.2d 733, 456 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A.D.2d 733 (Guibor v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guibor v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, Inc., 90 A.D.2d 733, 456 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Lane, J.), entered September 11, 1981, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion to compel defendants to produce for discovery and inspection certain items prescribed in paragraphs 17 and 20 of the moving affidavit, is modified, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of remanding the matter for the purpose of establishing procedures, heretofore lacking, regarding the discovery and inspection of the pathology specimens and the photographs and their negatives, with discovery and inspection thereof to be completed within 30 days of the date of this court’s order. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Markewich and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Lane, J.), entered September 11, 1981, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion to compel defendants to produce for discovery and inspection certain items prescribed in paragraphs 17 and 20 of the moving affidavit, is modified, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of remanding the matter for the purpose of establishing procedures, heretofore lacking, regarding the discovery and inspection of the pathology specimens and the photographs and their negatives, with discovery and inspection thereof to be completed within 30 days of the date of this court’s order. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Markewich and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A.D.2d 733, 456 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guibor-v-manhattan-eye-ear-throat-hospital-inc-nyappdiv-1982.