Guhr v. Chambers
This text of 8 Serg. & Rawle 157 (Guhr v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon examining the record in this case, it appears, that both the original defendants were parties to the- appeal. It is true, that one Only was active in entering the appeal.; but the other never disavowed it. On the contrary, he appeared and. pleaded, after the plaintiff had filed a-statement against both. By this statement,-the plaintiff concluded himself. He could not afterwards denv, that both defendants were in the Court of Common Pleas. He had no right therefore, to issue an execution on the report of the arbitrators. It is the opinion of the Court, that the execution was erroneous, and should be quashed.
Execution quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Serg. & Rawle 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guhr-v-chambers-pa-1822.