Gugino v. Gascoyne
This text of 272 A.D.2d 1037 (Gugino v. Gascoyne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order in favor of plaintiff against defendant Gascoyne reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict was inadequate. Judgment in favor of defendants Schwalb Company and Lohwater affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment entered November 21, 1946, is for plaintiff and against defendant Gascoyne in an automobile negligence action. The judgment entered October 1, 1946, is for defendants Schwalb Company and Lohwater for no cause of action. The order denies plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground of inadequacy.) Present — Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gugino-v-gascoyne-nyappdiv-1947.