Guevara v. Guevara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guevara v. Guevara

132 A.D.2d 596, 517 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49136

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 132 A.D.2d 596 (Guevara v. Guevara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guevara v. Guevara, 132 A.D.2d 596, 517 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to set aside certain provisions of the parties’ separation agreement and amendment thereto and for the sole custody of the parties’ son, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated October 14, 1986, which denied his motion for an order directing psychiatric and forensic evaluations of the parties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court, Nassau County, did not abuse its discretion by denying the plaintiff husband’s motion. The plaintiff’s contentions concerning his reasons for bringing this action, inter alia, to obtain a change of custody of the parties’ son, do not include factual allegations which would warrant the ordering of psychiatric and forensic evaluations of the parties at this juncture in the proceedings. Niehoff, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to set aside certain provisions of the parties’ separation agreement and amendment thereto and for the sole custody of the parties’ son, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated October 14, 1986, which denied his motion for an order directing psychiatric and forensic evaluations of the parties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court, Nassau County, did not abuse its discretion by denying the plaintiff husband’s motion. The plaintiff’s contentions concerning his reasons for bringing this action, inter alia, to obtain a change of custody of the parties’ son, do not include factual allegations which would warrant the ordering of psychiatric and forensic evaluations of the parties at this juncture in the proceedings. Niehoff, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D.2d 596, 517 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guevara-v-guevara-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack