Guevara-Rodriguez v. State

932 So. 2d 1227, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11330, 2006 WL 1879100

Opinion

CANADY, Judge.

In this appeal briefed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Eulice Guevara-Rodriguez challenges her convictions and sentences for interference with child custody, giving a false name, having no valid vehicle registration, grand theft of a motor vehicle, possession .of drug paraphernalia, false imprisonment, and driving with a suspended license after prior violations. We affirm Guevara-Rodriguez’s convictions without comment. We also affirm the sentences as imposed.

We write only to point out that the State’s concession of error as to the imposition of the $3 teen court cost was erroneous. Guevara-Rodriguez failed to preserve that issue because she did not raise the matter at the sentencing hearing or file a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).

Affirmed.

DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.