Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker

D. Nevada

Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker

DecidedMarch 30, 2022

Docket3:20-cv-00652

StatusUnknown

This text of Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker (Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker, (D. Nev. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 kee 6 BRANDON GUEVARA-PONTIFES, Case No. 3:20-cv-00652-MMD-CSD 7 Petitioner, ORDER 3 V. RENEE BAKER, et al., ° Respondents. 10 11 Respondents have filed a motion for leave to file an exhibit under seal. (ECF No. 12 || 35.) The exhibit in question is the presentence investigation report of Petitioner Brandon 13 || Guevara-Pontifes, which contains confidential information. The Court therefore finds that 14 || compelling reasons exist to grant the motion and seal this exhibit. See Kamakana v. City 15 || and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006). 16 Petitioner has also filed an unopposed motion to extend time (first request) (ECF 17 || No. 37) to respond to Respondents’ motion to dismiss. The Court finds that the request 18 || for extension is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and therefore 19 || good cause exists to grant this motion. 20 It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motion for leave to file an exhibit under 21 || seal (ECF No. 35) is granted. 22 It is further ordered that Petitioner's unopposed motion to extend time (first 23 || request) (ECF No. 37) is granted. Petitioner will have up to and including May 23, 2022, 24 || to file a response to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 25). 25 DATED THIS 30" Day of March 2022. 26 “a A □□ IRANDA M. DU 28 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 kee 6 BRANDON GUEVARA-PONTIFES, Case No. 3:20-cv-00652-MMD-CSD 7 Petitioner, ORDER 3 V. RENEE BAKER, et al., ° Respondents. 10 11 Respondents have filed a motion for leave to file an exhibit under seal. (ECF No. 12 || 35.) The exhibit in question is the presentence investigation report of Petitioner Brandon 13 || Guevara-Pontifes, which contains confidential information. The Court therefore finds that 14 || compelling reasons exist to grant the motion and seal this exhibit. See Kamakana v. City 15 || and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006). 16 Petitioner has also filed an unopposed motion to extend time (first request) (ECF 17 || No. 37) to respond to Respondents’ motion to dismiss. The Court finds that the request 18 || for extension is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and therefore 19 || good cause exists to grant this motion. 20 It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motion for leave to file an exhibit under 21 || seal (ECF No. 35) is granted. 22 It is further ordered that Petitioner's unopposed motion to extend time (first 23 || request) (ECF No. 37) is granted. Petitioner will have up to and including May 23, 2022, 24 || to file a response to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 25). 25 DATED THIS 30" Day of March 2022. 26 “a A □□ IRANDA M. DU 28 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guevara-pontifes-v-baker-nvd-2022.