Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 kee 6 BRANDON GUEVARA-PONTIFES, Case No. 3:20-cv-00652-MMD-CSD 7 Petitioner, ORDER 3 V. RENEE BAKER, et al., ° Respondents. 10 11 Respondents have filed a motion for leave to file an exhibit under seal. (ECF No. 12 || 35.) The exhibit in question is the presentence investigation report of Petitioner Brandon 13 || Guevara-Pontifes, which contains confidential information. The Court therefore finds that 14 || compelling reasons exist to grant the motion and seal this exhibit. See Kamakana v. City 15 || and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006). 16 Petitioner has also filed an unopposed motion to extend time (first request) (ECF 17 || No. 37) to respond to Respondents’ motion to dismiss. The Court finds that the request 18 || for extension is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and therefore 19 || good cause exists to grant this motion. 20 It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motion for leave to file an exhibit under 21 || seal (ECF No. 35) is granted. 22 It is further ordered that Petitioner's unopposed motion to extend time (first 23 || request) (ECF No. 37) is granted. Petitioner will have up to and including May 23, 2022, 24 || to file a response to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 25). 25 DATED THIS 30" Day of March 2022. 26 “a A □□ IRANDA M. DU 28 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE