Guess v. Reynolds

Fourth Circuit

Guess v. Reynolds

458 F. App'x 233

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 15, 2011·No. No. 11-7153·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Guess appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Guess v. Reynolds, No. 9:10-cv-01161-TLW, 2011 WL 3471054 (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2011). We deny Guess’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Guess appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Guess v. Reynolds, No. 9:10-cv-01161-TLW, 2011 WL 3471054 (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2011). We deny Guess’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Guess v. Reynolds, 458 F. App'x 233 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

458 F. App'x 233 (Guess v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related