Guess v. Benedict College
This text of Guess v. Benedict College (Guess v. Benedict College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1396
THURMOND GUESS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE BENEDICT COLLEGE; DAVID H. SWINTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-1571
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-04-553-3; CA-04-743-3)
Submitted: August 20, 2004 Decided: September 8, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thurmond Guess, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Thurmond Guess appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his complaints without prejudice based on reports and
recommendations of two magistrate judges. We have reviewed the
records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Guess v. Benedict
College, No. CA-04-553-3 (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2004); Guess v. Benedict
College, No. CA-04-743-3 (D.S.C. Apr. 28, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Guess v. Benedict College, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guess-v-benedict-college-ca4-2004.